8/31/2023 0 Comments Audirvana vs hqplayer7.3 sounds on low level vs 7.4 I am cant tell how I thanking to you. Lets you try custom upsampling PCM or DSD conversion options and can help get a better stream to your dac than the internal digital filters which can sometimes be low fidelity in the DACs. Once /20078.txt are logged in the application, your day free trial automatically. Making bit depth higher on hqplayer without doing any processing makes it sound a little worse. ![]() I'd tried it before a few years ago using SSRC and it seemed to make the sound worse so I thought no more of it.So… it is entirely possible for changes in “data energy distribution” to be audible in the subjective listening experience even if the audio-engine is “bit-perfect”. With the talk of HQPlayer I thought I'd give it another go, and the easiest way seemed to be using SOX. I don't stream so it's incredibly easy to offline upsample entire folders of music. audirvana plus 2.5 vs roon/roon + hqplayer IGNORED audirvana plus 2.5 vs roon/roon + hqplayer. HQPlayer has various high sampling and high quality sampling algorithms, as well as noise selection, noise modulation and modulator algorithms. ![]() Audirvana 3.5 does sound good on the desktop. With Yggrasil A2 I can upsample to at most 176.4kHz (4x). I have also tried the trial for HQPlayer but am totally confused by all the different setting is it worth the if i cannot do dsd or will it improve SQ separation etc if i just listen to HiRes downloads plus. Less body and density - some people might not like this cpasmoi you should use HQPlayer embedded (HQPlayer desktop will not work), Audirvana will see HQPe as UPNP Network device.Less "grain" and a more liquid, organic sound.Top end is a lot more precise, hi-hats and ride cymbals have clearly delineated attacks rather than a fuzzy halo.The difference it makes is really noticeable: jussilaako should weigh in on your question. I can't comment on bass as my system doesn't reproduce bass at the moment (waiting on subs). But it's like a 5-10% increase in quality and makes the Yggdrasil sound like a more expensive DAC - not just removing something that shouldn't be there, but actually changing the sound for the better. I'm not sure where exactly this should go - maybe we need a HQPlayer thread.Īnyway, I've been looking at how one can use JRiver as a front-end for HQPlayer and there are some folks using batch files and such janky solutions. Hqplayer and Roon have free trial periods Both can upsample PCM and DSD Try both for free and see what you like Just my 2 cents Enjoy. ![]() All of a sudden it occurred to me I might be able to use a virtual audio cable to pipe out of JRiver and into HQPlayer, and sure enough it works. I'm using VB Cable:, but I know there are others. It's pretty simple - I have a zone in JRMC which uses WASAPI to output to the input of the Virtual Cable. I can do any DSP I want in JRMC of course, and I do run a few VST plugins for EQ and such. In HQPlayer I simply configure the input in Settings to use WASAPI, listening to the output of the Virtual Cable. Using adaptive output rate, it seems to adapt to whatever rate I'm feeding it, even though I specify the input as audio: default/44100/2. Voila, I have a JRMC front-end for HQPlayer. I just got it working, so the jury's out on whether there are any sonic nasties, but I won't be able to do much critical listening until tonight. Note, this should work for most any player, it's not particular to JRiver.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |